
I think we should organize some boycotts.
We’ve had some conversations about consumerism lately and how it relates to the overall problems in society, and we all rail against this stuff but that’s usually where it ends. Words are exchanged and nothing happens. We’ve also been talking about how to promote Lose the Label and how great what Tricia’s doing with RED is and how that Facebook group has grown so fast and… well...
Let’s just combine it all.
Delia’s been making posts about how no one’s doing anything in the Feminists Unite group. Well, I have an idea. What if y'all launched a boycott of a beauty supplies company using stick figure anorexic models, demanding that they stop idealizing such an unhealthy standard of beauty, and… I’ll cap off my thoughts on the cause there because I'm sure you can come up with better demands than I can.
Thoughts on tactics after the jump...
=========
Here's how we can do a boycott.
Create a giant-ass Facebook group called Boycott (________ company). In the group description, make some demands. And spread the word through Facebook. When it gets big enough, start emailing media representatives telling them about this boycott. You can strike a blow at the images of these companies, something they spend millllllllllllllllllions of dollars a year… no, BILLIONS… to keep all fine and clean and coooool so their sales stay up
People have done boycotts before. But to my knowledge, no one’s done one through Facebook, or at least not a very successful one (as a total activist nerd with a finger close to the pulse on tech developments, if I haven’t heard of it, it can’t have been very big). So I don't think anyone's tried this before.
We can engage a lot of people. We can rally LtL’ers around it. We can bring new people into LtL. We get people thinking about consumerism. We can scare the shit out of some overpaid douche bags in business suits. You strike a blow at the corporates, the people we've been ripping on in the conversations I mentioned at the beginning of this post.
But more than that, this tactic can be applied to many of the causes on LtL. For the war, we could find a Halliburton subsidiary and focus incredible negative energy on it. For Darfur, we support existing divestment campaigns and launch new ones. For global warming, we could start boycotts against car dealerships that sell Hummers. Fuck.. the Global Warming group has an endless list of potential targets, knock yourselves out.
There's an endless supply of companies doing shady shit and we have a good way to slam them.
So who wants to try it out?
i'm game
I've already been looking around on the web tonight at cosmetic companies, looking at their sites, their models, and seeing if they test on animals... I am pretty tired right now and have to get up early, but I think that it is a great project. Good idea.
Also, I am down to help out with any other projects. They all appeal deeply to me. But for now, I am gonna keep researching cosmetics. I'll keep you posted.
Kalinka, kalinka, kalinka moya! V sadu yagoda malinka, malinka moya - Liz
rad
and I can help, I just can't take the lead on it. if things work out the way I'm guessing, I'll be chest deep in other projects (like the antiwar tour stuff) by the time you really get rolling.
===========
"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." ~Bob Dylan
liz, i'm definitely down to
liz, i'm definitely down to help you. i would LOVE to help...so just let me know what you find, and i'll be doing some research on my own. I also plan on taking action in the stop global warming area, i'll let ya'll know whats up with that as soon as i do.~Delia
cosmetics
Sounds good Delia - I will keep you posted. I'll probably be up tonight checking stuff out and I will pm you - do the same for me, okay?
Kalinka, kalinka, kalinka moya! V sadu yagoda malinka, malinka moya - Liz
awesome. n/t
===========
"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." ~Bob Dylan
yes/but
This is a great idea-- especially in regards to using Facebook for this. But ultimately, and perhaps this should be a discussion for the Feminists Unite group and not here, but I think it would be extremely difficult and, in the end, unsuccessful to boycott a cosmetics company for their projected image alone. And I truly believe that this is neither apathy, nor defeatism talking--- but it will be damn near impossible to do damage to a cosmetic company on the basis of their models (though believe me, I completely agree with the sentiment). Want to take down a cosmetic company? The way to do that, I feel, is by both criticizing it for its image (the unrealistic beauty aspect) and for something on a political level-- for instance, most of these companies use animal testing. I'm just throwing off ideas, really, but I'm reminded of your post, Jake, about our generation, and how they just wish they were told what to fight against. Well, I don't think one would be able to raise awareness of much of anything by boycotting a cosmetics company, firstly because people are so rooted in that bullshit image of anorexia and short-short-short skirts, and secondly because it might even perpetuate the (fucking awful) stereotype that feminists don't wear make-up, don't shave, and hate everybody (at least in ignorant people-- which is a lot of people). I'm not saying abandon the boycott idea-- it's a FANTASTIC idea, but I fear it might not be given any creedence if we go for a company on the basis of their social message. That being said, on the note of feminism:
What I think might be a great idea for the Feminists Unite group is to (among many things) focus on voting. I read somewhere that 50 percent of women in this country do not vote, despite their (rather recently) obtained right to do so. Now, if we focus hard on a voting campaign of sorts, targeted toward women, not only would we have more people excercising their rights, which generations of women fought tooth-and-nail for, but it would send across an empowering, feminist message.
Just my two cents.
good point
it might even perpetuate the (fucking awful) stereotype that feminists don't wear make-up, don't shave, and hate everybody (at least in ignorant people-- which is a lot of people)
good point. something to be aware of because it could make a campaign counterproductive. still, I think targeting the companies who are paying these models tons of money isolates it enough because those women aren't reality and they cause people physical harm. a campaign against that definition of beauty *might* even save some lives, directly, by showing that other women are dissenting against it.
also, given how careful these companies are about their image, how much money they're spending to keep the machine in order and well oiled... I see a boycott as a way to ram a crowbar in there. all you have to do is cost them money and you've won. all it takes to do that is media attention, which is easier to get than people think.
as for voting, I don't think it's a gender issue so much as it's a people issue. and I don't know how one could engineer a project like that anyway, not with the tools we have right now at least.
so that's my $0.02... now we have $0.04. man, we're rollin in the dough today. :-)
===========
"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." ~Bob Dylan
And excellent counterpoint.
And excellent counterpoint. And though I do agree that these companies are utterly rediculous in their perpetuation of certain beauty standards, we (and I use "we" as in, those of us who will boycot/protest against them-- and you can count me in on that category) must be careful not to hold or perpetuate any prejudices for any of these models either, OR for anyone who does, in fact, meet these standards of beauty (or even stride for them). Ultimately, and I'm sure you agree, it's about the acceptance and the recognition of beauty in women who do NOT happen to be a size 0, rather than the disapproval of those women who are.
Total: 6 cents.
Shall we keep a piggy bank? :)
yeah, well said
especially this part:
t's about the acceptance and the recognition of beauty in women who do NOT happen to be a size 0, rather than the disapproval of those women who are.
absolutely. the peripheral effect I'd hope a boycott would have would be to let people know that it's ok not to look like the stick girl on TV, that that's not what people look like... so don't worry about it.
we're up to .08... one more and we got a dime!
===========
"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." ~Bob Dylan
fantastic
i think that that's a great idea.... definitely on the global warming stuff for sure. i'll do whatever i can, just let me know what i can do. i'm going to be focusing on (RED) this week for the most part but if you guys can point me in a direction for something.. i'll do it.
i agree with everything
i agree with everything everyone has said, and by the way, i wear makeup and i love short short skirts...and there is nothing wrong with that.~Delia
nope
definitely nothing wrong with that. i love skirts too and wear makeup.
word
I am all about the short skirts and makeup. I mean, I don't approve of skirts that are so short that I can see anything I like without trying (because really, I don't need to see that), but short in general is not something I have an issue with.
Ali
"And we hold these truths to be self-evident: #1 George W. Bush is not president. #2 America is not a true democracy. #3 The media is not fooling me." -Ani DiFranco
skirts?
hmm - short, short skirts? okay... now we're getting somewhere.
short skirts are fun, and they are flirty... but i think that they send (even if it is the wrong) message to people - children, men, and other women - that this is normal. i don't know how to elaborate on this more, but after reading "short short skirts" i am frustrated and in a rut. i just disagree.
Kalinka, kalinka, kalinka moya! V sadu yagoda malinka, malinka moya - Liz
i agree
i'm not a short, short skirt-er. i just don't feel comfortable enough to do that for me. but, i think that if others want to wear them, its okay.. it only really bothers me when they wear them when its freezing outside. then it definitely is sending a wrong message.. but i don't know if its sending a "normality" message to others though because there are so many people who don't wear short, short skirts.
idk.
tricia :o)
skirts
alright. i see your point.
however, if women are wearing a mini skirt, showing off her cheeks, walking around in high heels so the entire world can see her wonders, it wouldn't surprise me if she doesn't get respect. it just doesn't surprise me. men don't go around in clothes like that... yeah, i know, we aren't the same as men... but honestly, come on! who wants to see that kind of stuff except for fashionistas, and guys who are on the prowl for a night?
hot day? sure... guys suffer through it too.
whatever - girls can wear whatever the hell they want. i am not going to go around saying "oh my god! why in the world is she wearing that!" i just hope that if they get any come ons, they are looking for them, and not offended by them.
i really don't know what i am trying to say here. i am out of words.
Kalinka, kalinka, kalinka moya! V sadu yagoda malinka, malinka moya - Liz
skirts
no i agree, it wouldn't suprise me either if she doesn't get respect. you have to dress appropriately for the situation you are in too. but, its their choice i guess.
skirts again
okay, good. you were freaking me out there for a sec tricia! :0) but not anymore.
Kalinka, kalinka, kalinka moya! V sadu yagoda malinka, malinka moya - Liz
lol
no don't worry. :o)
worried (skirts)
no offense ya'll, but this conversation is running dangerously close to the argument of "she was wearing a short skirt, its her fault she got assaulted". i know you've all heard it. and i feel like its border-line being presented here. and i just have to fight that, wherever i read it or hear it or see it. there is a lot more to short-skirt culture than definitive lines of "she's a ho/she's respectable". Its a fashion thing. There are dresses, there is beachwear, there are situations in which short skirts are appropriate. they are presented as being stylish all around, and women CANNOT be blamed for responding to that. granted, some of the problem lies with the media...but short skirts are portrayed as being fashionable, and therefore they will be worn. i don't think that means that a woman doesn't deserve respect. in any case, blaming women in short skirts for negative attention they may get is not cool. ALL of the blame for bad behavior lies with the perpetrator. always. period. its not like every time i see a guy outside in the summer without a shirt on i have to go attack him. that never happens. but women in short skirts are big bad man-teasing villains? F that.~Delia
asdf
"and women CANNOT be blamed for responding to that"
actually, they can... style changes and to be caught up in it, i think, is superficial if it means to lower yourself and be subjected by it. hooray for marketing!
Kalinka, kalinka, kalinka moya! V sadu yagoda malinka, malinka moya - Liz
Delia I think you are wrong.
Delia I think you are wrong. Perpetrator wrong. Fine. One is always being warned when on vacation not to go out on the beaches at night - do so at your own risk. People are being put in jail because they knew a murder was going on and they didn't say anything. A scantily-clad woman walking through a suburb is picked up and her background searched. All of these situations require a little common sense. Is it the vacationers fault that there is a possibility of theft/danger? No, but he/she knows the risk and makes a conscious decision otherwise. The person who knew about the murder did actually commit any physical crime, however was in a position where he/she knew better and should have acted differently. Even though the woman walking through the suburbs had no faulty history she was still picked up based of what she was wearing because of stereotypes. Similarily, when one dresses for the day/event he/she must think about how they are presenting themselves and the reactions that could be incurred. Again, similarily, one must think about the situations he/she puts him/herself in. Fashion is meant to illicit a reaction and it does just that. A push-up bra wasn't invented so women could keep tabs on their breasts, it was created to accentuate the female physique. Men are responsible for their reactions, yes, but women must consider the reprocussions. - Chris
reply
fine. i'm not saying wear a 2-inch skirt to a business meeting, nor am i saying that women shouldn't be careful and protect themselves. obviously, you don't wear certain things in certain situations...the same as you wouldn't walk down certain dark streets alone at night. that is common sense. but saying that a woman is asking for it and doesn't deserve respect just because she wears a mini-skirt in ANY situation?? so if i wear a short jean skirt over my bathing suit down to the lake this summer, i'm fair game for rapists, and no one should listen to a word i say because i'm stupid? all i'm saying is that there ARE appropriate times and places for short skirts (as mentioned in my last comment) and that wearing a skirt in those times or places doesn't make a woman "bad" or "wrong" or "trashy"...and it certainly doesn't mean she deserves to be hurt. Just because i don't go on the beach at night in one country doesn't mean i'll never go to any beach at night. and i'm sorry, but comparing murder conspiracy with wearing a skirt? that seems a bit extreme. regardless of what a woman is wearing, she never deserves to be raped or abducted or attacked. EVER. the same as the tourist doesn't deserve to be robbed or killed, and the scantily clad woman doesn't deserve to be kicked out of the suburbs. These are the things about the world that we're all supposedly on LtL because we want to change, and you're basically saying to sit back and accept them. I know they are reality right now. but i'm here because i want to change them. i want to combat poverty so you don't get robbed on the beach. i want to combat racism and classism so prejudice fades, and anyone can stroll through the suburbs. and i want to combat gender inequalities that lead to mysoginistic mindsets and gender based crimes like rape.
~Delia
reply
i agree with delia on how a woman never deserves to be raped, attacked, or abducted. and certainly her wearing of a skirt doesn't give someone free reign to do what he pleases because she was "asking for it."
i also agree that there are appropriate situations for skirt wearing and inappropriate ones.
so i guess, my view on all of this is that a woman has a right to wear what she pleases and she has a right to feel comfortable in what she wears. she doesn't dismiss her rights by wearing a skirt. but, if she does wear a skirt in inappropriate situations, then she may gain some unrespectful glances her way. but this doesn't give ANYONE a right to rape, etc. she isn't asking for it by doing this. all she may be asking for is a few comments coming her way.
but most of all, i totally 100% agree with delia in that some stuff needs to be changed.. "i want to combat poverty so you don't get robbed on the beach. i want to combat racism and classism so prejudice fades, and anyone can stroll through the suburbs. and i want to combat gender inequalities that lead to mysoginistic mindsets and gender based crimes like rape."
of course
none of us are saying that women deserved to get raped. yeah right. far from it. women just need to be conscious of the signals they are sending out. if they know what they are doing, then go for it.
Kalinka, kalinka, kalinka moya! V sadu yagoda malinka, malinka moya - Liz
Well it's more about the
Well it's more about the fact that there was a slight suggestion that short skirts and clothes of that ilk provoke rape, which they don't. Rape is always about power, and very rarely about sex. If rape were concomodate with short skirts, then old women wouldn't get raped (and they do-- unfortunately, all the time). Furthermore, I'm not saying you disagree with what I just said (far from it), I'm just saying I think that's what prompted Delia's post. And I agree 100%.
this is so true. great
this is so true. great comment.
~Delia
also
i think that this whole discussion involves a lot of stereotypes. that women who choose to wear short skirts are sluts/whores/etc. just because they choose to wear this doesn't mean that they are. i hate these stereotypes. what you wear should not dictate how you are viewed in society. if she wants to wear it, then go right on ahead. as long as it makes you happy in your own way, then good for you. i would say that sometimes people make bad decisions on what they wear for a particular time and place, but these things happen. Of course, there are exceptions to this. THere are women who will purposely wear shorter items of clothing in hopes of attracting attention from men. But if she wants to do it, who are we to stop her? Like I said before, by putting herself out there like this, she can't be blamed if she is raped, killed, abducted, etc. She should NEVER take the blame for the actions of another. She may have put herself in a situation where men could take advantage, but the blame remains on the other person rather than the victim.
i just wish that these stereotypes could be erased. judging people based on what tthey wear and what they look like is just plain stupid.
I read an interesting book I
I read an interesting book I would suggest to all called, "blink". It is written by Malcom Gladwell and deals with stereotyping and how the mind uses this skill as a basis for knowledge and defence. My personal belief: stereotyping good / being bound by the stereotype bad. For instance, when you meet someone you box them and then ask do they fit? It's a way to develop your gut feeling.
My previous post talks about the responsibility of people to understand their surroundings and the need for them to act accordingly. This does not negate the responsibility of the perpetrator for his/her actions. The victim does not deserve to be raped, assualted, etc because she decides she wants to wear a skirt that day. No obviously not. That's not what I'm saying. I'll make another analogy. You drive a car all the time yet when it gets stormy out or snows you become careful or don't go out because it is potentially dangerous. Likewise, although it is not you're fault you must take into consideration the potential for these things to happen and whenever possible decrease your chances.
I am absolutely not saying sit back and do nothing because things will never change. I am saying find the root of the problem and change it from there. Many girls don't realize how they dress beyond that the outfit is trendy. So, if we are able to change trends we are able to change the vast majority of peoples clothing choices. Cause and effect.
As much as I would like to think that solving poverty would stop stealing and a solution to all suffering would stop crime, I believe that these things will happen regardless so it is our duty as members of society and LtL to educate people and create better decision makers.
I read an interesting book I
Sorry posted twice.
Post new comment